ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Holding the story, holding the professional: a pilot study of genetic counselling supervision in Portugal.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing complexity of genomic medicine has intensified the emotional, ethical, and relational demands placed on genetic counselling professionals. In response to these demands, genetic counselling supervision has been increasingly recognised as a core component of safe and sustainable practice. However, its implementation across Europe remains uneven, and empirical evidence on feasible and acceptable supervision models in clinical settings is limited. This study reports a mixed-methods pilot evaluation of a narrative-informed, group-based genetic counselling supervision programme implemented within Portuguese public genetic services. This is a foundational component of the first phase of the MAG-SUDOE project, a transnational initiative supported by the Interreg SUDOE programme aimed at developing a joint supervision solution for genetic counselling professionals in Portugal, Spain, and France. Eight genetic healthcare professionals were recruited, and seven completed the intervention. Feasibility and acceptability were examined through participation and attendance rates, session evaluations, and assessment of the supervisory working alliance. Preliminary impact was explored using self-report measures of psychological well-being and perceived counselling quality, complemented by qualitative data from written narratives, semi-structured interviews, and a final focus group. The programme demonstrated high feasibility, with strong engagement and completion despite clinical workload constraints, and high acceptability, reflected in positive session evaluations and strong supervisory working alliance. Qualitative findings indicated that participants experienced supervision as a safe and reflective space that reduced isolation, supported emotional regulation, and enhanced reflective awareness. Overall, this pilot study provides promising indications of benefit for reflective practice and professional well-being, supporting its further adaptation and implementation within a transnational European framework.
Identifiers
42581101What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.