ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Safe and Integrated Practices in Rhinoplasty: A Contemporary Perspective on Function, Aesthetics, and Patient Safety.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo present an integrated, evidence-based view of current rhinoplasty practices, emphasizing patient safety, functional preservation, and interdisciplinary collaboration.
methodsWe reviewed the literature published between 2019 and 2025, including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and official documents from the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (ISAPS) covering functional, structural, and preservation approaches. Studies regarding the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases were analyzed to identify associations with patient safety and satisfaction.
resultsA global shift from reductive techniques to structural and preservation approaches prioritizing anatomical respect and functional integrity was observed. Evidence supports team planning, psychological screening, and standardized protocols applied across the operative pathway to reduce complications. In addition, technological advances have improved predictability and surgical training. Despite advances, substantial variability in techniques and protocols persists, underscoring the need to strengthen a shared culture of safety through standardized perioperative workflows, structured documentation, and validated outcome assessment, rather than standardizing operative techniques.
conclusionsRhinoplasty should combine esthetic precision with preservation of nasal function and ethical responsibility. Establishing a global culture of safety requires more than protocols; it demands empathy, collaboration, and the surgeon's active role as a technical and ethical mediator at all stages of care. While not an official ISAPS guideline, this article offers a critical reflection on current evidence and discussions within the ISAPS Patient Safety Committee. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42581097What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.