ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Ten-Year Single-Center Experience in the Surgical Management of Gynecomastia: Comparative Outcomes of Four Techniques.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGynecomastia is the most common benign breast condition in men. Although multiple surgical options exist, the optimal technique that minimizes complications while maximizing patient satisfaction remains debated.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 128 patients (239 breasts) who underwent gynecomastia surgery between 2013 and 2023 at a university hospital. Techniques included glandular excision alone, liposuction alone, combined excision with liposuction, and mastectomy with free nipple-areola grafting. Primary endpoints were postoperative complications, while secondary endpoints included patient-reported satisfaction and pain scores (telephone survey, 0-10 scale).
resultsThe mean age was 27.3 years. Procedures were distributed as excision 39.8%, combined 42.2%, liposuction 5.5%, and grafting 12.5%. Overall, 24 of 128 patients (18.8%) developed complications: 31.4% after excision, 0% after liposuction, 3.7% after the combined technique, and 37.5% after grafting (p = 0.0002). Major complications (4.7%) consisted exclusively of hematomas requiring reoperation. Among 43 respondents (33.6%), mean satisfaction scores were high (8.6/10 for excision, 8.5/10 for combined technique), while pain was lowest in the combined group (2.8/10).
conclusionsThe combined excision-liposuction technique provided the best balance between safety and patient satisfaction, with significantly fewer complications than excision alone. It should be considered the preferred first-line surgical option for most gynecomastia cases, whereas free nipple-areola grafting remains indicated for advanced presentations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42581096What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.