ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
Defining global priorities in hematopoietic transplantation and cellular therapy: a statement paper from EBMT Global Committee.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hematopoietic cell transplantation, cellular and gene therapies, and (CAR)-T cells have revolutionized outcomes in hematologic disorders. However, major disparities persist in their availability, accessibility, and affordability, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The EBMT Global Committee aims to address these inequalities. A structured survey was distributed to EBMT members to identify regional and thematic priorities, assess current infrastructure, and assess willingness to contribute to global initiatives. Responses were analyzed descriptively and served as the basis for the current statement paper. A total of 145 responses from 43 countries were collected. Most respondents (67.1%) reported working in JACIE- or FACT-accredited centers. The highest priority regions for EBMT outreach were Eastern Europe (non-EU) (43.9%), Latin America (38.2%), and Africa (33.5%), followed by the Middle East (29.5%). The leading thematic priorities were education and training (74.3%), scientific collaboration (56.0%), and registry development (43.4%). Most respondents expressed willingness to actively contribute, particularly in educational activities (59.7%). Qualitative responses emphasized the need for practical guidelines, mentorship programs, telemedicine, virtual discussion/clinical rounds on difficult cases, and support for LMIC capacity building. The EBMT community strongly supports an expanded global role focused on education, capacity building, and collaboration in underserved regions.
Identifiers
42581093What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.