ReviewNpj imaging2026
Review of image segmentation techniques for biomedical micro-CT: from laboratory absorption imaging to synchrotron phase-contrast.
Review in Npj imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
X-ray micro-computed tomography (μCT) is widely used in biomedical research for non-destructive, high-resolution imaging. Synchrotron Radiation Phase-Contrast μCT (SR-PCI-μCT) further enhances image quality with higher Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), improved contrast, and faster acquisition. However, segmenting SR-PCI-μCT images remains challenging due to their heterogeneous image property and limited training data. Additionally, the increasing throughput of synchrotron facilities demands robust, efficient segmentation methods. This paper reviews a list of recent segmentation approaches in biomedical μCT. Traditional methods remain simple and effective for simple, high-contrast structures but require extensive tuning and generalize poorly to complex, low-contrast soft tissues. Data-driven models provide higher accuracy and robustness yet rely heavily on large expert-annotated datasets, limiting reproducibility and cross-dataset adaptability. Recent advance on vision transformers have shifted the paradigm from task-specified to more domain-specified segmentation, though these techniques are still evolving and require adaptation for SR-PCI-μCT studies. This survey provides the first bi-modality review covering both laboratory and synchrotron biomedical μCT segmentation. It consolidates recent segmentation methodologies, identifies major trends in deep-learning techniques, and highlights current limitations across SR-PCI-μCT. Additionally, it outlines open challenges to guide future research and practical advancements in biomedical μCT segmentation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.