Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42581067›Full record

ReviewNpj imaging2026

Review of image segmentation techniques for biomedical micro-CT: from laboratory absorption imaging to synchrotron phase-contrast.

Hao Song, Ning Zhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Npj imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hao SongDivision of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. hsong1991@gmail.com.
Ning ZhuDivision of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray micro-computed tomography (μCT) is widely used in biomedical research for non-destructive, high-resolution imaging. Synchrotron Radiation Phase-Contrast μCT (SR-PCI-μCT) further enhances image quality with higher Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), improved contrast, and faster acquisition. However, segmenting SR-PCI-μCT images remains challenging due to their heterogeneous image property and limited training data. Additionally, the increasing throughput of synchrotron facilities demands robust, efficient segmentation methods. This paper reviews a list of recent segmentation approaches in biomedical μCT. Traditional methods remain simple and effective for simple, high-contrast structures but require extensive tuning and generalize poorly to complex, low-contrast soft tissues. Data-driven models provide higher accuracy and robustness yet rely heavily on large expert-annotated datasets, limiting reproducibility and cross-dataset adaptability. Recent advance on vision transformers have shifted the paradigm from task-specified to more domain-specified segmentation, though these techniques are still evolving and require adaptation for SR-PCI-μCT studies. This survey provides the first bi-modality review covering both laboratory and synchrotron biomedical μCT segmentation. It consolidates recent segmentation methodologies, identifies major trends in deep-learning techniques, and highlights current limitations across SR-PCI-μCT. Additionally, it outlines open challenges to guide future research and practical advancements in biomedical μCT segmentation.

Identifiers

PMID42581067
PMCPMC13462960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.