Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42581058›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Dual branch negotiation model for robust water resource monitoring with spectral ambiguity and boundary degradation.

Lingzhi Kong, Yan Zhou, Wei Ding, Kwang Woo Nam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lingzhi KongDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Kunsan National University, Gunsan, 54150, South Korea.
Yan ZhouDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Kunsan National University, Gunsan, 54150, South Korea.
Wei DingKey Laboratory of Computing Power Network and Information Security, Ministry of Education, Shandong Computer Science Center (National Supercomputer Center in Jinan), Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan, 250000, China.
Kwang Woo NamDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Kunsan National University, Gunsan, 54150, South Korea. kwnam@kunsan.ac.kr.

Funding

the Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement RS-2022-00143336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the remarkable progress in remote sensing water-body segmentation, existing methods still struggle to jointly preserve fine boundary fidelity and achieve robust semantic disambiguation under cross-domain shifts, undermining applications like flood risk assessment and urban water monitoring. This limitation largely stems from purely data-driven fitting with little explicit control over aliasing artifacts and spectrally induced physical ambiguities. To address this issue, we propose an Enhanced Anti-aliasing dual-branch Segmentation network (EAAS-Net) that integrates sampling theory and spectral physics. At the signal level, an Edge-Adaptive Anti-aliasing Gate (EAAG) is inserted before downsampling to explicitly suppress boundary aliasing, improving sub-pixel geometric fidelity along narrow rivers and complex shorelines. At the semantic level, a physical-guided branch and a multiscale Adaptive Spectral-Spatial Enhancement Fusion (ASEF) module extract domain-invariant spectral representations, enabling reliable separation of water bodies from spectrally similar shadows. At the decision level, a Dynamic Mutual Fusion Decoder (DMF-Decoder) employs a two-round negotiation scheme to progressively reconcile conflicts between visual features and physical priors across scales. Experiments on the GLW dataset and the challenging cross-domain GLH-water dataset show that EAAS-Net achieves highly stable mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) scores of 0.926 and 0.849, respectively, while maintaining sharp boundaries. Furthermore, with 60.2 M parameters, the model maintains a highly efficient inference speed of 18.1 ms per image, demonstrating an optimal balance between sub-pixel accuracy and computational cost, indicating strong potential for near-real-time, large-scale operational deployment.

Indexed as

Dual-branch networkEdge-adaptiveFeature negotiationRemote sensing

Identifiers

PMID42581058
PMCPMC13462108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.