ArticleScientific reports2026
Electrochemical discharge etching of porous tungsten emitters for field emission electric propulsion applications.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Field Emission Electric Propulsion (FEEP) systems offer high specific impulse and precise low thrust capability, making them suitable for micro propulsion applications. Porous tungsten is a promising material option for field emission emitters, offering advantages such as the formation of sharp tips and pore structures that enhance propellant transport through capillary action. However, the fabrication of well-defined porous tips remains insufficiently understood in terms of the relationship between etching process parameters and resulting structures. In this study, a spark-assisted electrochemical discharge etching was applied to fabricate porous tungsten emitter needles tailored for FEEP applications. Key process parameters, including applied voltage, power supply type, electrolyte type, molar concentration, and initial porosity, were investigated to establish an electrochemical etching domain. Distinct etching regimes associated with different morphological outcomes were identified, and the process window for forming viable porous emitter tips was found to be significantly constrained, with failure modes such as tip collapse, loss of porosity, and surface sealing observed outside this range. Under certain conditions, EDS analysis further revealed the formation of a multicomponent crust layer enriched in oxygen and potassium, which suppressed porosity preservation and influenced the resulting tip morphology. The fabricated emitter was integrated into a FEEP propulsion module, and preliminary field emission experiments conducted under vacuum conditions demonstrated emission feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.