Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42581053›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Public attitudes and preferences on organ donation and allocation in china: a cross-sectional study.

Diehua Hu, Yixuan Wang, Qingyuan Hu, Hongwen Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Diehua HuDepartment of Medical Ethics, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China.
Yixuan WangDepartment of Sociology, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qingyuan HuThe Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China. huqingyuan2008@csu.edu.cn.
Hongwen LiDepartment of Medical Ethics, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, China. hongwenli@126.com.

Funding

National Social Science Foundation of China 25CZX060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This cross-sectional study aimed to examine public attitudes toward postmortem organ donation and allocation fairness preferences in China. To this end, an online survey was administered through the Wenjuanxing platform among adults aged ≥ 18 years (N = 895). Only 15.1% of respondents had decided to donate, whereas 74.1% remained undecided; nevertheless, 73.7% would accept a donated organ if needed. Reciprocity (76.0%), first-come-first-served (70.5%), and medical urgency (65.7%) were most frequently endorsed as fair allocation principles. In the full-sample logistic regression (N = 895), positive attitudes (odds ratio [OR] = 5.65, p < 0.001), higher knowledge (OR = 1.56, p < 0.001), and knowing someone who had donated or was considering donating (OR = 1.96, p = 0.013) predicted willingness to donate. Further, a conditional analysis among decision-makers (N = 232) revealed that married status (OR = 0.18, p = 0.007), religious beliefs (OR = 0.22, p = 0.020), and higher education (OR = 1.50, p = 0.024) significantly differentiated donors from non-donors. Collectively, these findings indicate that organ donation willingness in China remains low despite broadly positive attitudes. Knowledge deficits, procedural uncertainty, and family-centered decision-making norms impede commitment, thereby underscoring the need for enhancing public education and institutional transparency.

Indexed as

Public OpinionTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsAdolescentAdultAgedChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAllocation preferencesChinaCross-sectional surveyOrgan donationPublic attitudes

Identifiers

PMID42581053
PMCPMC13462538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.