ArticleScientific reports2026
Scalable prediction of suicidal risk in university students: a three steps machine learning approach in university settings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Suicide is a leading cause of death among young adults, with university students representing a particularly vulnerable subgroup. Although prevention efforts often depend on psychopathological symptom assessments, these are resource-intensive and less practical for large-scale screening. This study evaluated whether easily collectable contextual and psychosocial variables can independently predict suicidal risk in university students. Data from 470 university students were analyzed using random forest machine learning (ML) algorithm. Three models were developed: Model 1 included 53 contextual and psychosocial variables (sociodemographic, lifestyle, social support, academic stressors, and health); Model 2 relied solely on 10 psychopathological symptom scales; and Model 3 integrated all variables. Predictive performance improved progressively across the three models (AUC = 0.72, 0.77, and 0.80, respectively). Key predictors included both contextual and psychosocial variables (e.g. low social support, diminished university belonging) and psychometric evaluation of symptoms (anxiety, depression, coping strategies). Taken together, these results show that contextual and psychosocial variables provide meaningful information for identifying university students at risk for suicide, and psychometric symptom measures offer further refinement of risk detection. Findings are discussed in relation to the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide and Escape Theory. This ML approach offers a scalable framework for suicide risk screening in academic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.