Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42580838›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Real-world evidence on antibiotic use among privately insured beneficiaries in Saudi Arabia: a retrospective analysis of claims data.

Shabab Alghamdi, Ibrahim Abdulrahman Aljuffali, Ahmed M AlDammas, Nebras Abu Alhamayel, Muhammed Jumaah, Myriam Bechwati, Joelle Barhoun, Saeed Mastour Alshahrani, Nada Alagil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shabab AlghamdiCouncil of Health Insurance, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim Abdulrahman AljuffaliCouncil of Health Insurance, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed M AlDammasCouncil of Health Insurance, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Nebras Abu AlhamayelCouncil of Health Insurance, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammed JumaahItkan Consulting, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Myriam BechwatiCenter of Clinical, Health Economics, and Outcomes Research, Dubai, UAE.ORCID 0009-0002-0190-2295
Joelle BarhounCenter of Clinical, Health Economics, and Outcomes Research, Dubai, UAE.
Saeed Mastour AlshahraniDepartment of Public Health, King Khalid University, Abha, Asir, Saudi Arabia.
Nada AlagilCouncil of Health Insurance, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia Nalagil@chi.gov.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInappropriate and broad-spectrum antibiotic use contributes to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and higher healthcare costs. In Saudi Arabia, despite ongoing antimicrobial stewardship efforts, comprehensive real-world evidence on antibiotic prescribing patterns remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate antibiotic prescribing among insured (Daman) beneficiaries in Saudi Arabia and benchmark against international standards.

designRetrospective analysis of deidentified health insurance claims from the National Platform for Health and Insurance Exchange Services (NPHIES), covering 1 November 2023-31 October 2024.

settingAntibiotic prescriptions were identified within claims and linked to diagnostic codes using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM) to determine clinical indications for use.

participantsAmong 4.02 million claimants, 8.3 million antibiotic prescriptions were identified. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Antibiotic claims were mapped to the Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) drug list. Hospital antibiotic consumption was expressed as defined daily doses (DDD) per 100 patient-days for five selected inpatient antibiotics, whereas overall antibiotic consumption (in both community and hospital settings) was expressed as DDD per 1000 insured persons per day. Treatment duration, prescriber specialty and patient demographics were measured. Appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing for respiratory tract infections was assessed using Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) metrics.

resultsAge-stratified and sex-stratified antibiotic prescription rates showed disproportionately high use in male infants (509.6 prescriptions per 1000) and older males (641.9 prescriptions per 1000). General practitioners accounted for 80% of prescriptions. Broad-spectrum beta-lactams, particularly amoxicillin-clavulanate, predominated. Overall antibiotic consumption was 11.63 DDD per 1000 insured persons per day, comparable to European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption Network (ESAC-Net) outpatient benchmarks. Mean treatment durations ranged 8-14 days, exceeding global stewardship recommendations. HEDIS indicators revealed overprescribing, particularly for upper respiratory tract infections.

conclusionsThis is the first claim-based analysis of antibiotic prescribing patterns among Daman beneficiaries in Saudi Arabia. Decision support systems, artificial intelligence-driven audits and targeted education could optimise prescribing, reduce AMR and inform policy.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdolescentAdultAgedAntimicrobial StewardshipChildChild, PreschoolDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInsurance, HealthMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibioticsCross-Sectional StudiesDrug UtilizationEPIDEMIOLOGYHEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENT

Identifiers

PMID42580838
PMCPMC13475115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.