Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42580829›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with balloon occlusion of the descending aorta: protocol of the randomised controlled CPReboa study.

Lisa-Marie Gaube, Esther D Sparks, Manuela Iten, Jürgen Knapp, Monika Fürholz, Joerg C Schefold, Lukas Hunziker Munsch, Matthias Hänggi, Gert Krummrey, Martin Müller and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07434726 (CPReboa), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07434726 narecruitingnot on this map

CPReboa: In-hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation With Balloon Occlusion of the Descending Aorta

TypeinterventionalSponsorInsel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRan2026 to 2030Enrolled98ConditionsCardiac ArrestArmsresuscitative endovascular occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lisa-Marie GaubeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0002-6158-0929
Esther D SparksDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0007-7117-9158
Manuela ItenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Jürgen KnappDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Monika FürholzDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Joerg C SchefoldDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Lukas Hunziker MunschDepartment of Cardiology, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Matthias HänggiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Gert KrummreyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Martin MüllerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Wolf E HautzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland wolf.hautz@insel.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-2445-984X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiac arrest (CA) remains a major health burden with poor survival and poor neurological outcomes despite decades of advances in resuscitation science. Although high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation is essential, it provides only limited cerebral and coronary perfusion, and current strategies relying on high-dose epinephrine may adversely affect cerebral microcirculation. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has emerged as a potential adjunct to improve coronary and cerebral perfusion without compromising microvascular blood flow. Although animal studies and small human case series suggest physiological and clinical benefits of REBOA in CA, randomised clinical trials are lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This prospective, randomised controlled, single-centre clinical trial investigates the effect of REBOA during the treatment of CA. The planned study duration is 36 months, with a total of 98 patients to be randomised to either standard advanced life support (ALS) or ALS plus REBOA. Adult patients with an in-hospital CA, successful placement of a femoral artery introducer sheath and any electrical cardiac activity in the initial rhythm analysis are eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria comprise traumatic CA, asystole as the initial rhythm, pregnancy and CA occurring on intensive care units, in the operating room or in cardiac catheter laboratory. The primary outcome is sustained return of spontaneous circulation lasting for at least 20 min. Secondary and exploratory outcomes include survival, neurological outcome, changes in aortic blood pressure, end-tidal CO ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol (Version 2.1, 11.02.2026) was approved by the Cantonal Ethics Committee of Cantone Bern (2025-D0108). Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07434726.

Indexed as

Aorta, ThoracicBalloon OcclusionCardiopulmonary ResuscitationHeart ArrestHumansProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReturn of Spontaneous CirculationCardiopulmonary ResuscitationEmergency Service, HospitalOut-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Identifiers

PMID42580829
PMCPMC13475120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.