ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2026
Rethinking Phase I units in the era of immuno-oncology: a three-layer framework.
Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid expansion of immuno-oncology (I-O) and other advanced therapies is reshaping the complexity of early-phase clinical development. While core Phase I principles remain fundamental across oncology, emerging modalities introduce additional requirements for translational integration, specialized safety management, and therapeutic-specific infrastructure. However, the organizational functions of Phase I units have not evolved at the same pace and remain largely centered on conventional operational responsibilities. Drawing on the practices of leading Phase I units across the USA, Europe, and China, and comparing evolving regulatory frameworks of the US Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency/Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, and China's National Medical Products Administration, we propose a global perspective on the future development of Phase I units. We present a three-layer framework encompassing core Phase I foundations applicable across oncology, advanced translational capabilities, and ecosystem-level functions supporting emerging therapeutic development. Beyond ensuring patient safety and high-quality trial conduct, modern Phase I units should integrate translational research, artificial intelligence-enabled and model-informed drug development, regulatory science, and public engagement, while specialized centers may additionally support advanced therapy infrastructure, such as point-of-care manufacturing. Recognizing the diversity of institutional resources, we further propose a collaborative network model to facilitate scalable implementation and international harmonization. This framework positions Phase I units as integrated platforms connecting clinical investigation, translational science, regulatory innovation, and emerging therapy development, providing practical guidance for building future-ready early-phase clinical research infrastructure worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.