ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2026
Mechanical limits shape the eccentric form of rose prickles.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanical limits shape the eccentric form of rose prickles.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rose prickles are vegetal weapons familiar to most green-thumbed individuals. Their distinctive feature is an oval cross-section, which contrasts with the mostly circular shapes of natural and man-made stingers. However, the reason for their eccentricity remains poorly understood. We explore the hypothesis that the morphology of prickles is physically limited by trade-offs between bending, buckling and cutting. In our experiments, polydimethylsiloxane stingers with varying cross-sectional shapes were used to lacerate a gelatin skin analogue. Circular stingers bend along the direction of travel and create superficial scratches. By contrast, prickles with a moderate aspect ratio have enough mechanical stability to cut (or provide grip). However, when they become too narrow, the blades weaken and buckle. The least unfavourable aspect ratio falls between 2 and 4, not inconsistent with the available biological data (2.7±0.7). This novel mechanical trade-off suggests that cutting mechanics are a potential driver of the rose prickle morphology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.