ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2026
Short-term mortality prediction based on biochemical blood markers in azotemic cattle with renal disease.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRenal disease in cattle is often suspected based on urinalysis and blood biochemical analysis, but prognostic biomarkers for survival are lacking. HYPOTHESIS/
objectivesIdentify blood and urine biomarkers predicting mortality or discharge in azotemic cattle. ANIMALS: Thirty-four azotemic adult cattle referred to the Clinic for Cattle of the National Veterinary School of Toulouse.
methodsIn our prospective cohort study, renal disease was suspected based on clinical signs and azotemia (plasma creatinine concentration > 228 μmol/L and urea concentration > 5 mmol/L) and confirmed by urinalysis or ultrasonography. When death or euthanasia occurred, confirmation was obtained by gross and histologic examination. To construct a decision tree for short-term prognosis, additional biochemical and cytological biomarkers were measured in urine and blood samples collected at hospitalization. Outcomes were defined as favorable (discharge) or unfavorable (death). Correlation analyses, univariate and multivariate statistics, receiver operating characteristic curves, and decision tree modeling were performed.
resultsThirteen cattle survived and 21 died or were euthanized. Mortality was associated with higher plasma symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA), creatinine, and urea concentrations, as well as hypocalcemia, hypochloremia, and lower hematocrit. Creatinine, SDMA, chloride, and albumin were the most consistent predictors of outcome. A decision tree combining creatinine and SDMA achieved 87.5% accuracy. Animals with plasma creatinine concentration < 605 μmol/L and SDMA < 33 μg/dL had the highest probability of survival. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Plasma creatinine, urea, SDMA, chloride, and albumin concentrations are promising short-term prognostic biomarkers in azotemic cattle. Combined SDMA and creatinine assessment may assist clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.