ArticleAge and ageing2026
Health and health service use of Australian female live-in caregivers at multiple caregiver trajectory timepoints: a population-based dataset with time-matched controls.
Article in Age and ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare health and health service use in female live-in caregivers along multiple timepoints with population-based controls over a 20-year period.
methodsData from 6000 women aged 50-77 caring for someone who was ill, disabled or frail, were collected over eight waves of Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health 1946-51 cohort (from 2001 to 2022). Physical functioning (PF), general mental health (MH), depressive symptoms, stress and general practitioner (GP) and medical specialist visits were compared between caregivers and time-matched controls, before, during and after caregiving. Fully adjusted mixed linear models or logistic regression, including sensitivity analyses by caregiving intensity, were conducted.
resultsIn adjusted results, caregivers and controls had similar initial levels of PF, but caregivers had significantly poorer PF over time including during [2.39 (-3.68, -1.10)] and after stopping caregiving [-2.19 (-3.51, -0.87)]. Caregivers had poorer MH on all three measures [eg, -5.56 (-6.61, -4.51) on SF-36 MH] and more GP visits across the study than controls, with the poorest scores in the period before stopping caregiving. Accessing medical specialists did not differ between caregivers and controls until after stopping caregiving, when caregivers had higher odds [1.22 (1.06, 1.40)]. Associations were stronger in caregivers providing higher intensity care.
conclusionsCaregiver physical and MH was poorest and GP visits highest prior to stopping caregiving, while specialist visits increased after stopping caregiving. Interventions to assist caregivers manage their own health needs, particularly in the period before stopping caregiving, and assisting them maintain health service use throughout and following caregiving cessation should be tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.