ArticleUltrasonics2027
Passive cavitation detection analysis of materials with varying levels of color Doppler twinkling.
Article in Ultrasonics, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanism of color Doppler twinkling has been previously associated with microbubbles through various experiments. As there has been limited work directly showing evidence of bubble oscillation simultaneously with twinkling, passive cavitation detection (PCD) was used to record raw radiofrequency (RF) signals from twinkling objects that could contain microbubble information. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) twinkling markers and non-twinkling samples were evaluated in a PCD setup using a single element passive cavitation detection transducer while varying transmitted peak negative pressures with an L11-4v linear transducer. Recorded PCD data was analyzed in both the time and frequency domains for evidence of bubbles. In the time domain, twinkling markers were found to have more pulse-to-pulse voltage variation than low and non-twinkling samples. In the frequency domain, twinkling markers were found to have higher magnitudes in the inharmonic bands compared to the low and non-twinkling samples. When varying the peak negative pressure of the ultrasound waves from low to high, both the time domain variation and frequency domain inharmonic bands were found to correlate with twinkling (P < 0.043 and P < 0.037, respectively). These results support microbubble oscillation as a cause of twinkling, particularly from the likely presence of inertial cavitation of microbubbles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.