ArticleGenetics2026
Structured multimodal deep learning improves genomic prediction in future environments.
Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting phenotypes from genetic and environmental information is a long-standing challenge in genetics and plant breeding. Deep neural networks are a promising approach due to their capacity to approximate nonlinear biological processes. Despite initial expectations, recent studies have found that deep neural networks under-perform compared to linear methods, even on continent-scale datasets. We attribute this to several failure modes of deep learning, including greedy learning, the tendency to over-emphasize a single type of input data. As a solution, we present the structured interaction neural network (SINN), which combines statistical decomposition of genetic, environmental and interaction effects with deep neural networks. SINN dissects phenotype prediction into isolated component modeling tasks, revealing poor generalization of learned representations to new environments as the main limitation for prediction of genotype-by-environment interactions and overall yield. We reach competitive performance on yield prediction in the next cycle of 2 maize multi-environment trial datasets, including new genotypes and environments. In the Genomes to Fields (United States) dataset, SINN achieved higher overall accuracy (0.63) than BLUP-based methods (0.43) and a neural network from previous literature (0.48), and surpassed previous top-performing models with a lower RMSE (2.40 vs. 2.46 Mg/ha, mean yield 9.51 Mg/ha). Similar gains were observed in a secondary dataset consisting of Chinese national maize variety trials (MaizeGEP). SINN achieved higher overall accuracy (0.79) than BLUP-based methods (0.49) and a neural network from previous literature (0.76). By combining statistical genetics and modern deep learning, SINN enables accurate, modular and scalable genomic prediction in new environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.