Observational studyJCI insight2026
Acute tubular injury versus acute interstitial nephritis in the kidney precision medicine project.
Observational study in JCI insight, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04334707 (Kidney Precision Medicine Project), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Kidney Precision Medicine Project
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
45 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUNDAcute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI), but the diagnosis may be missed as kidney biopsies are rarely obtained when acute tubular injury (ATI) is suspected.METHODSThe Kidney Precision Medicine Project is a cohort study that obtains kidney biopsies from individuals with AKI, which undergo pathologic and molecular interrogation. We compared ATI and AIN cases among the first 60 AKI participants.RESULTSOn clinicopathologic adjudication, 30 patients (50%) had a primary adjudicated diagnosis of ATI, 13 (22%) patients had AIN, 9 (15%) had diabetic nephropathy, and 3 (5%) had other conditions. There were increased interstitial white blood cells and tubulitis (P < 0.05 for both) in AIN compared with ATI. Prior to biopsy, the treating clinician suspected ATI in 83% of the cases with adjudicated ATI, while the treating clinician suspected AIN in 54% of the cases with AIN. Tissue transcriptomic signatures showed enrichment of proinflammatory signaling and increased expression of CXCL9, a chemokine induced by IFN-γ, in myeloid cells of participants with AIN. CXCL9 localized to inflammatory infiltration in spatial transcriptomic data.CONCLUSIONAdjudication of kidney biopsies revealed distinct pathologic and molecular profiles between ATI and AIN. Kidney biopsy should be considered more frequently in AKI, as AIN is clinically underrecognized.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT04334707.FUNDINGNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases grants U01DK133081, U01DK133091, U01DK133092, U01DK133093, U01DK133095, U01DK133097, U01DK114866, U01DK114908, U01DK133090, U01DK133113, U01DK133766, U01DK133768, U01DK114907, U01DK114920, U01DK114923, U01DK114933, U24DK114886, UH3DK114926, UH3DK114861, UH3DK114915, and UH3DK114937.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.