ArticleInternational journal of immunopathology and pharmacology
Beyond antibiotic prophylaxis: A scoping review of infective endocarditis prevention in the device era.
Article in International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reassessing Antibiotic Duration in Dental Infections: A Narrative Review and Marginal Benefit-Harm Framework with a Clinical Checklist.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infective endocarditis (IE) remains a severe condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Dental procedures involving manipulation of gingival tissue or the periapical region may cause transient bacteremia, making prevention strategies at the dental-medical interface clinically important. Current guidance emphasizes selective antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) for patients at the highest cardiac risk while prioritizing long-term oral health maintenance. This scoping review synthesizes contemporary evidence (2021-2025) and major international guidelines to clarify the relationship between invasive dental procedures (IDPs) and IE, identify patients who may benefit from AP, and outline practical prevention strategies in dental practice. A PRISMA-ScR-guided scoping review was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE (January 2021-October 2025), with citation tracking of key guidelines, including those from the American Heart Association (2021), European Society of Cardiology (2023), and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Thirty-four studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final evidence synthesis. The evidence base comprised international guidelines, systematic reviews, observational studies, registry analyses, and narrative reviews relevant to IE prevention and dental management. AHA and ESC recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with high-risk cardiac conditions undergoing IDPs, defined as procedures involving gingival or periapical manipulation or mucosal perforation. NICE guidance does not recommend routine prophylaxis but supports individualized decision-making and informed consent. Contemporary data indicate the strongest short-term association between IDPs and IE following tooth extractions and oral surgical procedures in high-risk patients. In these groups, AP has been associated with reduced IE incidence, with estimated numbers needed to prevent one case of approximately 244 for all IDPs, 143 for extractions, and 71 for oral surgery. Evolving epidemiology underscores the need for accurate cardiac risk stratification. Prevention should focus on identifying high-risk patients, maintaining oral health, communicating procedural risks, and applying selective AP when indicated, although evidence remains largely observational.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.