Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42579717›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Analyzing an organism's sensors using Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) models with bias, variance, and confusion matrices.

Christopher Wang, Elianna Schimke, Tristan Kako, Aiden Gao, Martina Lamberti, Joost le Feber, Sarah Marzen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher WangDepartment of Natural Sciences, Scripps and Pitzer Colleges, Claremont, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3206-4048
Elianna SchimkeDepartment of Natural Sciences, Scripps and Pitzer Colleges, Claremont, California, United States of America.
Tristan KakoSchool of Arts and Sciences, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Aiden GaoPioneer Academics, Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Martina LambertiUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon1, CNRS UMR5292, INSERM U1028, Sleep Team, Center for Research in Neuroscience of LYON, Bron, France.
Joost le FeberDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Sarah MarzenDepartment of Natural Sciences, Scripps and Pitzer Colleges, Claremont, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5386-1101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological organisms have sensors that communicate information about the environment. Analyzing how well these biological sensors function has usually been done with mutual information between the sensor signal and the environment, but that can be computationally intractable and summarize something quite complex with just a single number. We suggest that alternatively, one may profitably analyze these biosensors using bias and variance or confusion matrices, depending on the kind of environment. Stimulus-dependent Maximum Entropy models are used to develop estimators of the environmental state given the sensor state, and these estimators in turn are then used to calculate either the bias and variance of the estimator or confusion matrices. We focus on several examples to understand the utility of non-information-based analyses: ligand-receptor binding models spanning from genetic regulation to neuronal communication to bacterial chemotaxis and spin-glass Ising models for neural activity in cultured neurons. These new computationally efficient analyses add insight into existing analyses based on mutual information; in particular, mutual information estimates give one number to characterize responses to all environmental inputs, and this analysis method characterizes how sensors respond to each environmental input. Categorical analyses, meanwhile, indicate the presence of memory without much prediction in confusion matrix elements in cultured neural networks, adding to previous understanding from mutual information estimates.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesEntropyModels, BiologicalAnimalsChemotaxisNeurons

Identifiers

PMID42579717
PMCPMC13460584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.