ArticlePloS one2026
Analyzing an organism's sensors using Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) models with bias, variance, and confusion matrices.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological organisms have sensors that communicate information about the environment. Analyzing how well these biological sensors function has usually been done with mutual information between the sensor signal and the environment, but that can be computationally intractable and summarize something quite complex with just a single number. We suggest that alternatively, one may profitably analyze these biosensors using bias and variance or confusion matrices, depending on the kind of environment. Stimulus-dependent Maximum Entropy models are used to develop estimators of the environmental state given the sensor state, and these estimators in turn are then used to calculate either the bias and variance of the estimator or confusion matrices. We focus on several examples to understand the utility of non-information-based analyses: ligand-receptor binding models spanning from genetic regulation to neuronal communication to bacterial chemotaxis and spin-glass Ising models for neural activity in cultured neurons. These new computationally efficient analyses add insight into existing analyses based on mutual information; in particular, mutual information estimates give one number to characterize responses to all environmental inputs, and this analysis method characterizes how sensors respond to each environmental input. Categorical analyses, meanwhile, indicate the presence of memory without much prediction in confusion matrix elements in cultured neural networks, adding to previous understanding from mutual information estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.