ArticlePloS one2026
Quantifying carbon fluxes in pigs at different production stages: Intake, excretion, and retention.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A detailed understanding of how dietary carbon (C) is partitioned between excretion, gaseous emissions, and retention is essential for integrating C into current nutrient accounting frameworks, thereby bringing nutrient losses and gas emissions within a single standardized system. To support such integration, the present study aimed to construct C balance models for weaned pigs, grower-finisher pigs, and sows using extant prediction equations and established constants to estimate dietary C input and C outputs via excreta, gas emissions, and retention in body tissues. Predicted C balances showed variable agreement across production stages, with comparatively closer agreement observed in grower-finisher pigs. Estimates of C intake and C output via exhalation were generally consistent with reported values, whereas predictions of fecal, urinary, and enteric CH4 outputs showed greater deviation, indicating areas requiring further refinement. Overall, the models developed in this study offer a conceptual framework for incorporating C into a unified nutrient accounting system. The present study demonstrates the feasibility of combining existing equations to estimate C flows at the animal level, while also highlighting key uncertainties and data gaps that need to be addressed in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.