ArticlePloS one2026
The effects of bar positioning, stance width, repetition, and load on muscle activity during the barbell back squat.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The barbell back squat is used widely across multiple sporting disciplines as part of strength and conditioning training. There are multiple training variations within performing a BBS. The hypothesis of this study was that bar positioning (high bar versus low bar), stance width (wide stance versus narrow stance), weight, and the number of repetitions completed (light weight - ten repetitions at 50% of maximum; heavy weight - three repetitions at 80% of maximum) can be manipulated for targeted training effects. The aim of the study was to quantify the effect squatting technique has on the activation of the rectus femoris, vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, semitendinosus, gastrocnemius and gluteus maximus. Surface electromyography and kinematic data were recorded from eighteen healthy participants (twelve male, six female). Mean total area under the activation curve was compared for each muscle. Adopting a wide stance width showed increases in both peak and cumulative activation of the vastus medialis (p < 0.015). Squatting with increased weight showed increased cumulative activation of the vastus lateralis and semitendinosus (p < 0.041). An increased peak activation of the biceps femoris was observed when a high bar and wide stance technique was performed with a heavy weight compared to a light weight (p = 0.047). A narrow stance squat showed a 3.7° increase in peak knee flexion (p = 0.010) and a decrease of 8.2° of hip abduction (p < 0.001). A low bar position revealed increased hip flexion of 3.4° (p = 0.012). Overall, consistent muscle activations did not favour any combination of squat parameters. Athletes wishing to increase strength may choose one of several combinations of squat stance, bar positioning, and weight-to-repetition ratios, guided by what is most comfortable for the athlete.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.