Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42579667›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Stepping up: A qualitative examination of youth Camogie players' perceptions of playing up an age grade.

Sinéad O'Keeffe, Andrew Lane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sinéad O'KeeffeSchool of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3077-1044
Andrew LaneSchool of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9137-2255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePlaying up an age grade is a common phenomenon in youth Camogie, but there is no current understanding of the perception of youth players in doing so. This study aimed to utilise the athlete voice to qualitatively examine youth Camogie players' perceptions of playing up an age grade within the sport.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with adolescent club Camogie players currently playing up an age grade (n = 15; 14.4 ± 1.1 years). Interviews were audio-recorded and the transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsDespite initial difficulties encountered, participants ultimately enjoyed playing up, reporting enhanced performance and skill development, alongside increased psychosocial competence. However, the pressures and demands of playing up, negative peer interactions, and impaired intrinsic motivation were acknowledged as perceived negatives, but strategies such as improved social inclusion, coach and older player support, and player autonomy were suggested to facilitate a better experience.

conclusionThe findings highlight the need to provide developmentally appropriate opportunities for youth Camogie players that support players' progression, while also being cognisant of the risks of injury and burnout. Coaches play a critical role in enabling these opportunities, but player autonomy should ultimately guide decision-making. When supported effectively, positive playing up experiences can foster competence and confidence, contributing to improved player retention.

Indexed as

AthletesAthletic PerformancePerceptionAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleMotivation

Identifiers

PMID42579667
PMCPMC13460593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.