ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
Improving Accessibility and Usability of Clinical Data for the Swiss Personalized Health Network: Development and Usability Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In large-scale research initiatives such as the Swiss Personalized Health Network (SPHN), ensuring interoperability and ease of use across diverse clinical datasets is challenging due to a lack of standardization and semantics. The approach taken by the SPHN with the creation of a reference common dataset integrating various data structures and standards creates complexities for researchers aiming to explore and find specific clinical concepts to assess project feasibility. Semantic enrichment and exploration through SNOMED CT offer a potential solution by enabling structured queries that could simplify data discoverability and enhance dataset usability across Switzerland. Objective: This study evaluates how a semantic layer can improve the exploration of the SPHN dataset by leveraging SNOMED CT's hierarchical terminology. To validate this hypothesis, we developed the Smart SNOMED Search for SPHN (S4) tool, which leverages a semantic enrichment of the dataset, facilitating semantic searches using the Expression Constraint Language of SNOMED CT. Methods: The SPHN dataset underwent semantic enrichment, where concepts and attributes not already represented were systematically mapped to SNOMED CT codes and associated value sets. An additional 717 meaning bindings and 232 value sets were created. The S4 tool was designed to enable Expression Constraint Language-based queries, allowing users to retrieve relevant SPHN concepts and value sets effectively. We tested the tool using a validation dataset representing commonly encountered clinical data warehouse elements and evaluated its precision, recall, and F1-scores. Results: The S4 tool demonstrated high accuracy, with an overall precision of 95.3%, recall of 97.5%, and an F1-score of 96.4%, indicating effective retrieval and alignment of SPHN concepts with SNOMED CT codes. The enrichment also highlighted gaps within the SPHN dataset, such as a lack of representation and the inability to use postcoordination, enabling enhanced semantic connections that further supported data discoverability. Conclusions: The S4 tool validates the hypothesis that semantic representation enhances data explorability within large frameworks such as the SPHN, making it more accessible for research. While effective, future work could address limitations by refining search precision and improving accessibility for users less familiar with SNOMED CT, thereby supporting SPHN's mission to facilitate personalized health care research through enhanced data interoperability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.