Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42579607›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Global relationships between body size and urban affinity across more than 30,000 plant and animal species.

Corey T Callaghan, Diana E Bowler, Vaughn Shirey, Brittany M Mason, Laura H Antao, Ingmar Staude, John H Wilshire, Thomas Merckx

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Corey T CallaghanDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0415-2709
Diana E BowlerUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom.
Vaughn ShireyDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.
Brittany M MasonDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5325-5686
Laura H AntaoResearch Centre for Ecological Change, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Ingmar StaudeInstitute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2306-8780
John H WilshireDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, United States.
Thomas MerckxWildness, Biodiversity and Ecosystems under Change (WILD), Department of Biology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6195-3302

Funding

Academy of Finland 340280German Research Foundation DFG FZT 118Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship 891052U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture FLA-FTL-006297U.S. National Science Foundation 1937959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urbanization is a major global driver of biodiversity change, with species responses to urban settings ranging from avoidance to exploitation. To better understand these responses, we conducted a global analysis of urban relative affinity inferred from occurrence data across more than 30,000 animal and plant species. Our synthesis showed a consistent pattern across taxa and biogeographic regions: many species are urban avoiders, while few thrive as urban exploiters-a pattern we coin 'species urbanness distribution'. We then assessed whether body size, an integrative ecological trait fundamental to space use, mobility, metabolism, and environmental sensitivity, showed consistent associations with urban affinity among species and across 371 taxonomic families. Analyses were conducted at the interspecific level and focused primarily on variation among taxonomic families (with an accompanying application to view results available for each family here: https://globalecologyresearchgroup.github.io/Callaghan_et_al-2026-eLife-ShinyApp/). Larger body sizes were generally associated with greater urban affinity in plants compared to animals, though these size-affinity relationships showed considerable variability among families. Our findings highlight the heterogeneous relationship between body size and urban affinity across the tree of life, underscoring the importance of tailored strategies to support urban biodiversity. This research advances ecological understanding of urban filtering and provides a framework for guiding biodiversity-sensitive urban planning amid accelerating global urbanization.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBody SizePlantsUrbanizationAnimalsanimalsbiodiversityecologyplants

Identifiers

PMID42579607
PMCPMC13461149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.