ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026
Stepping Up Enhanced Rate Calculations with EATR-Flooding.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several recent methods have shown that it is possible to compute rate constants of very slow biomolecular processes using simulations where a time-dependent bias is added along one or several collective variables (CVs). We previously reported the exponential average time-dependent rate (EATR) method, which can improve upon these approaches by accounting for how efficiently the external biasing potential modifies the observed rate using a learned CV-quality factor γ. This results in more accurate rate estimates using the same data when biasing a suboptimal coordinate. As formulated, however, EATR depended on the biasing potential varying over time to properly determine the biasing efficiency, which limits the method's applicability to quasi-static biasing schemes such as "flooding" or on-the-fly probability enhanced sampling (OPES). Here, we present the EATR-flooding approach, which generalizes our method by replacing the need for a time-dependent bias by instead varying (stepping up) the strength of the biasing potential across multiple sets of simulations. We implement this approach in an open source Python library, and demonstrate that this approach is accurate without substantial loss of efficiency compared to standard EATR for a coarse-grained protein system, and also show good performance on a fully atomistic cavity-ligand model. Two additional appealing features of EATR-flooding are an internal check for overbiasing and the fact that only a single γ parameter is predicted for a given choice of CVs, as compared to our earlier results where the estimated γ empirically varied with the biasing rate. Finally, we believe EATR-flooding applies not only to OPES simulations but more generally to CV biasing enhanced sampling approaches, making it broadly useful.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.