Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42579316›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal2026

Minimally Invasive, Tissue-Preserving Breast Augmentation: Insights From a Large Case Series, Technique and Surgical Pearls.

Troy A Pittman, Anna Steve, Kamakshi Zeidler, Jeremy R Chidester, M Bradley Calobrace

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Troy A Pittman
Anna Steve
Kamakshi Zeidler
Jeremy R Chidester
M Bradley Calobrace

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast augmentation rates have remained relatively stagnant due to ongoing concerns regarding implant safety, fear of an oversized aesthetic, and trepidation surrounding general anesthesia. Advances in understanding breast anatomy have enabled innovative techniques that enhance breast volume while preserving surrounding soft tissues. This study presents the initial US experience with a minimally invasive, tissue-preserving breast augmentation (MI-BA) technique utilizing atraumatic tunneling, balloon-assisted pocket creation, and sixth-generation silicone implants.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to describe the authors' early experience with an inframammary-based MI-BA, including its anatomical rationale, surgical technique, learning curve, early outcomes, satisfaction, and practical insights to guide broader adoption.

methodsA prospective multicenter analysis was performed across 5 surgical centers over a 6-month period. Patient demographics, implant characteristics, anesthesia modality, early complications, patient-reported recovery, and satisfaction scores were prospectively collected. 161 consecutive patients were enrolled across five sites, but 2 were removed from the analysis due to age, as they were implanted off-label. Of note, the 2 patients removed were highly satisfied and had no complications.

resultsIn total, 159 consecutive female patients underwent MI-BA, with 13% undergoing concomitant fat transfer and/or mastopexy. All patients received tumescent infiltration, 95% of procedures utilized a bolus anesthesia technique, with 58% performed under local anesthesia with sedation. No early postoperative hematomas, loss of breast sensation, sensory disturbances, or abnormal pain were reported. Surgeon satisfaction was high (96%), and most patients reported being satisfied or extremely satisfied (94%).

conclusionsThis early US experience demonstrates a minimally invasive, tissue-preserving approach to breast augmentation that leverages implant-specific technologies to enable procedures under local anesthesia, minimize soft-tissue trauma, and facilitate rapid recovery. Although early outcomes are favorable, continued long-term follow-up is underway and will be reported in future studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 (THERAPEUTIC): For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationBreast ImplantsMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresAdultBreastFemaleHumansLearning CurveMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesSilicone GelsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultSilicone Gels

Identifiers

PMID42579316
PMCPMC13594676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.