ArticleAesthetic surgery journal2026
Minimally Invasive, Tissue-Preserving Breast Augmentation: Insights From a Large Case Series, Technique and Surgical Pearls.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tissue Preservation in Primary Breast Augmentation: From Founding Concepts to Early Evidence.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast augmentation rates have remained relatively stagnant due to ongoing concerns regarding implant safety, fear of an oversized aesthetic, and trepidation surrounding general anesthesia. Advances in understanding breast anatomy have enabled innovative techniques that enhance breast volume while preserving surrounding soft tissues. This study presents the initial US experience with a minimally invasive, tissue-preserving breast augmentation (MI-BA) technique utilizing atraumatic tunneling, balloon-assisted pocket creation, and sixth-generation silicone implants.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to describe the authors' early experience with an inframammary-based MI-BA, including its anatomical rationale, surgical technique, learning curve, early outcomes, satisfaction, and practical insights to guide broader adoption.
methodsA prospective multicenter analysis was performed across 5 surgical centers over a 6-month period. Patient demographics, implant characteristics, anesthesia modality, early complications, patient-reported recovery, and satisfaction scores were prospectively collected. 161 consecutive patients were enrolled across five sites, but 2 were removed from the analysis due to age, as they were implanted off-label. Of note, the 2 patients removed were highly satisfied and had no complications.
resultsIn total, 159 consecutive female patients underwent MI-BA, with 13% undergoing concomitant fat transfer and/or mastopexy. All patients received tumescent infiltration, 95% of procedures utilized a bolus anesthesia technique, with 58% performed under local anesthesia with sedation. No early postoperative hematomas, loss of breast sensation, sensory disturbances, or abnormal pain were reported. Surgeon satisfaction was high (96%), and most patients reported being satisfied or extremely satisfied (94%).
conclusionsThis early US experience demonstrates a minimally invasive, tissue-preserving approach to breast augmentation that leverages implant-specific technologies to enable procedures under local anesthesia, minimize soft-tissue trauma, and facilitate rapid recovery. Although early outcomes are favorable, continued long-term follow-up is underway and will be reported in future studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 (THERAPEUTIC): For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.