ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026
Distinct Rhythmic Competencies Identified via Internet-Based Assessment.
Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rhythm is a fundamental element of music that recruits perception and production pathways in the brain, and occurs across different timescales. Research suggests that rhythmic processing is composed of several related, yet potentially distinct competencies, including perception, production, beat-based processing, and sequence memory-based processing. Based on a recent lab-based study by Fiveash et al., the current experiment investigated whether these distinctions could be replicated with more participants (n = 300) completing an internet-based protocol, with the potential to be scaled up to larger samples. Production tasks included unpaced tapping and paced tapping to music (from the Battery for the Assessment of Auditory Sensorimotor and Timing Abilities). Perception tasks included the beat alignment test, the Burgundy best Musical Aptitude Test (synchronization), and the beat-based advantage task. Principal component analyses revealed strong overlap across tests. However, separations were shown between perception and production tasks, and unpaced and paced tapping tasks. Cluster analyses revealed participants with different rhythmic profiles, for example, (1) strong beat-based rhythm perception, weak sequence memory-based rhythm perception; and (2) strong production, weak perception. These results have implications for future research investigating individual differences in general and clinical populations, with the potential to guide clinical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.