ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Forensic characteristics of hymenal injuries in child sexual abuse: evidence from a large case series in Vietnam.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hymenal examination plays an important role in the forensic examination of suspected child sexual abuse. However, interpretation of hymenal findings remains challenging because of anatomical variation and subtle genital injuries, creating the potential for misinterpretation in medico-legal assessments. This study aimed to characterize hymenal morphology, hymenal injuries, and related forensic findings among female child sexual abuse victims in Vietnam and to examine patterns associated with repeated abuse. A retrospective analysis was conducted using forensic examination records of female children under 16 years of age referred for suspected sexual abuse at a specialized medico-legal center. Sociodemographic characteristics, assault-related information, hymenal morphology, and genital and extra-genital injuries were extracted from standardized forensic reports. Cases with diagnostic uncertainty or complex forensic findings were reviewed through expert consultation, and final conclusions were established by consensus within the forensic assessment team. A total of 443 children were included, with a mean age of 13.3 ± 2.6 years. The median interval between the alleged assault and forensic examination was 19 days (IQR: 4-89 days). Repeated sexual abuse accounted for 68.4% of cases. In multivariable analysis, older age (aOR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.14-1.37), parental divorce (aOR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.15-3.30), and abuse occurring in private or semi-private settings were independently associated with repeated sexual abuse. The annular hymen was the most frequently observed morphology (60.3%). Overall, 69.3% of cases showed combined hymenal dilatation and tear, followed by tear only (19.6%) and dilatation only (6.3%), while 4.7% had no hymenal injury. Most tears were old (81.7%) and located in the anterior region (65.2%). Additional genital and extra-genital injuries were uncommon. Repeated sexual abuse was common among examined victims. The annular hymen was the most frequently observed morphology, and combined hymenal dilatation and tear was the predominant injury pattern, while other genital and extra-genital injuries were uncommon. While these findings provide additional forensic reference data, no single hymenal morphology or injury pattern should be interpreted as diagnostic of sexual abuse in isolation and findings should be considered within the broader clinical and investigative context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42579240What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.