Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42579212›Full record

ArticleSports medicine - open2026

The Role of Training Age and Sport Specialization in Achieved Selection Tier in Adolescent Handball Talents.

Lutz Thieschäfer, Jörg Schorer, Urs Granacher, Dirk Büsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine - open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lutz ThieschäferSport and Training Department, Institute of Sport Science, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany. lutz.thieschaefer@uni-oldenburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6988-1040
Jörg SchorerSport and Movement Science Department, Institute of Sport Science, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4888-7048
Urs GranacherDepartment of Sport and Sport Science, Exercise and Human Movement Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-813X
Dirk BüschSport and Training Department, Institute of Sport Science, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2632-5308

Funding

Carl von Ossietzky Universität OldenburgDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe debate over whether beginning a sport early and specializing in it promotes athletic success in adulthood has been the subject of academic discussion for decades. Current evidence suggests the opposite. Multisport participation during youth and a later start in the primary sport may positively influence athletic success in adulthood, although the effects on youth athletes remain inconclusive. However, youth sports performance and developmental potential are central to success in talent selection processes, which decisively shape athletes' subsequent talent development. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the handball training age and prevalence rates of sport specialization in talented female U15 and male U16 handball players and to examine their associations with the attained selection tier. In addition, the years of practice in other sports (i.e., depth), the number of other sports (i.e., breadth), and the type of other sports were compared between selection tiers.

resultsThe vast majority of female (92.8%) and male (97.0%) players were classified as specialized athletes. Almost one third of the female (30.9%) and male players (30.8%) have never been involved in sports other than handball (i.e., single-sport players). Multisport engagement was not significantly associated with the selection tier in both sexes. Furthermore, there were no adverse associations between the breadth, depth, and type of other sports practiced and the selection tier. Female (g = 0.59) and male (g = 0.40) players who achieved higher selection tiers demonstrated a higher training age compared to non-selected players.

conclusionsIn light of the players' mid-teen age, the high prevalence rates of sport specialization were as expected. Nevertheless, the relatively high proportion of single-sport players may give cause for concern, particularly given that multisport engagement did not impede players from reaching high selection tiers. In fact, multisport engagement can be considered a viable alternative developmental pathway toward adult high performance. Furthermore, training age was associated with selection tier. Consequently, having a high training age may increase the likelihood of being selected as a "talent" which should be considered in talent selection processes.

Indexed as

DiversificationSecondary dataTalent selectionUnisport vs. multisportYouth

Identifiers

PMID42579212
PMCPMC13461995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.