Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42579190›Full record

ArticleAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2026

Bioprospecting of cultivable actinobacteria from tropical peat swamp forest soil reveals Streptomyces with potent antimicrobial activity.

Jetsda Tongtoht, Jintanart Wongchawalit, Ratchanee Mingma

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jetsda TongtohtDepartment of Science and Bioinnovation, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Science, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9584-8367
Jintanart WongchawalitDepartment of Science and Bioinnovation, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Science, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-0102-4677
Ratchanee MingmaDepartment of Science and Bioinnovation, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Science, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. faasrnm@ku.ac.th.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2976-7702

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens has become a major global health concern, highlighting the urgent need to discover new antimicrobial agents. Actinobacteria, particularly Streptomyces, are well known for their ability to produce diverse bioactive secondary metabolites with important pharmaceutical and agricultural applications. The purpose of this research was to isolate, characterize and evaluate the antimicrobial potential of actinobacteria isolated from tropical peat swamp forest soil. A total of 157 actinobacterial isolates were obtained and assigned to the genera Streptomyces, Microbispora, Microtetraspora, Micromonospora and Planosporangium. Preliminary antimicrobial screening revealed that 81 isolates (51.59%) exhibited inhibitory activity against at least one of the tested pathogens. Crude extracts from 17 selected isolates demonstrated antimicrobial activity with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum microbicidal concentration (MMC) values ranging from 0.024 to 12.50 mg mL

Indexed as

ActinobacteriaAnti-Infective AgentsBioprospectingSoil MicrobiologyStreptomycesDNA, BacterialForestsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16STropical ClimateWetlandsAnti-Infective AgentsDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SActinobacteriaAntimicrobial activityPeat swamp forest soilStreptomyces

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.