SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
Tibial bone transport using external fixation in adults: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTibial bone transport using external fixation is widely employed for the reconstruction of large and complex tibial bone defects; however, indications and surgical strategies remain highly heterogeneous. Tibial bone transport using external fixation is a demanding but reliable reconstructive technique, characterized by low failure rates and generally favorable outcomes despite frequent complications. Adequate soft-tissue management, selective docking-site grafting, and early functional rehabilitation were commonly reported. Further prospective studies are needed to standardize treatment strategies and improve clinical decision-making. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines in April 2025, searching PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library. Extracted data included patient demographics, comorbidities, indications, defect length, surgical technique, frame type, external fixation time, healing index, complications, failures, and ASAMI bone and functional outcomes. Methodological quality was assessed using the MINORS score and results were synthesized descriptively.
resultsA total of 3543 patients from 89 studies were included. Post-traumatic infection or osteomyelitis accounted for 58.5% of indications. The mean defect length was 7.04 cm. Bifocal bone transport was performed in 82.4% of cases, and circular external fixation was used in 79.0%. Early weight-bearing was allowed in approximately 95% of patients. The mean external fixation time was 11.0 months, with a healing index of 54.2 days/cm. The overall failure rate was 25/2748 (0.9%). Most studies were Level III-IV and were of fair-to-good methodological quality.
conclusionTibial bone transport using external fixation is a demanding but reliable reconstructive technique, characterized by low failure rates andgenerally favorable outcomes despite frequent complications. Adequate soft-tissue management, selective docking-site grafting, and early functional rehabilitation were commonlyreported. Further prospective studies are needed to standardize treatment strategies and improve clinical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III-IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.