ReviewLasers in medical science2026
Bibliometric mapping of scientific production on photodynamic therapy in cutaneous wounds: A web of science analysis.
Review in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous wounds, particularly chronic wounds, represent a major clinical and public health challenge because of their high prevalence, prolonged healing time, and substantial healthcare and economic burden. In this context, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has attracted growing interest owing to its antimicrobial potential and ability to modulate biological processes involved in tissue repair. This bibliometric study used the Web of Science Core Collection. Articles published between 2000 and 2025 were included without language restrictions. Bibliographic records were analyzed using VOSviewer and CitNetExplorer to characterize temporal trends in scientific production and the collaborative, conceptual, and intellectual structure of the literature. A total of 1,008 articles were identified. Scientific production increased markedly, particularly from 2020 onward, accompanied by the consolidation of international collaboration networks and the predominance of China, the United States, and Brazil among the most productive countries. Bibliometric analyses revealed a progressive reconfiguration of the field's conceptual structure. Initially centered on the microbiological control of wounds, the literature later incorporated biomaterials, nanotechnology, smart hydrogels, and multifunctional therapeutic platforms aimed at tissue repair. Historiographic analysis showed that this evolution occurred cumulatively, preserving the foundations established by pioneering studies while progressively incorporating newer biological and technological approaches. Research on PDT for cutaneous wounds is expanding and becoming increasingly interdisciplinary. The integration of photomedicine, nanotechnology, biomaterials science, and regenerative medicine appears central to the field's recent reorganization, providing a basis for future research and for the development of innovative therapeutic strategies for cutaneous wound management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.