ReviewInternational orthopaedics2026
From classification to anteromedial cortical contact: an integrative review of the Japanese and international literature on trochanteric fracture reduction and fixation.
Review in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInternal fixation of trochanteric femoral fractures achieves a high union rate, yet mechanical failure - cut-out, excessive sliding, loss of reduction and reoperation - remains a problem. Among the factors a surgeon can control, reconstructing anteromedial cortical contact has recently drawn attention. This review examines developments in classification, reduction, and fixation through this contact and its intraoperative assessment.
methodsMEDLINE (via PubMed) and Ichushi-Web (a Japanese medical literature database) were used in June 2026, with no limit on publication date.
resultsThe main structural drivers of instability are loss of posteromedial support and a lateral wall fracture. Fractures without posteromedial support are easily misread as stable on plain radiographs. When posteromedial support is lost, anteromedial cortical contact becomes a support that can be rebuilt. Anterior malreduction, which lacks this contact, was independently associated with cut-out, with an adjusted odds estimate similar to that for a tip-apex distance of at least 20 mm. The anteromedial cortex cannot be assessed reliably on the standard anteroposterior and true lateral views; an oblique (tangential) view is needed to profile it. Some patterns are not reduced by traction and need active, direction-specific reduction. In a randomised trial, adding an anterior support screw reduced loss of reduction and early sliding. The optimal amount of sagittal reduction remains uncertain.
conclusionThis development can be organised around reconstructing anteromedial cortical contact and visualising it during surgery. The remaining task is to visualise the anteromedial cortex reliably, define the optimal amount of contact, and test prospectively whether reconstruction improves radiographic and functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42579163What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.