ReviewArchives of microbiology2026
Microbial community restoration in abandoned coal mine lands: ecological assembly, functional mechanisms, and restoration strategies.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coal mining creates coupled physicochemical stresses, including extreme pH, nutrient depletion, metal enrichment, compaction, and loss of plant-derived carbon, that reduce microbial biomass, simplify interaction networks, and suppress biogeochemical functions. This review synthesizes recent evidence on microbial community restoration in abandoned coal mine lands, with emphasis on community assembly, stress adaptation, functional genes, and the interpretive value of high-throughput sequencing and meta-omics. During natural recovery, microbial propagule dispersal interacts with strong habitat filtering and rhizosphere selection. Pioneer plants and biological soil crusts progressively add carbon and nitrogen, stabilize surfaces, and recruit bacterial, fungal, and phototrophic guilds. Active interventions accelerate these processes by correcting substrate constraints and by inoculating soils, planting holes, seeds, or carriers with locally adapted microorganisms. However, field performance is often limited by competition with resident communities, host mismatch, environmental heterogeneity, and declining inoculant persistence. Restoration assessment should therefore combine taxonomic composition with functional-gene abundance, gene expression, enzyme activity, microbial biomass, and ecosystem-level indicators. Across sites, no single strategy is consistently superior: amendments act rapidly but may require repeated inputs, vegetation-based approaches are slower but potentially self-sustaining, and inoculation is most effective after major physicochemical barriers have been removed. Future research should prioritize replicated field trials, standardized and activity-resolved measurements, locally adapted consortia, and early-stage interventions that influence microbiome composition and function without assuming complete control. These priorities provide a practical basis for precision restoration of mine-affected soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42579135What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.