ReviewJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
ICSI media buffers: is there room for improvement?
Review in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maintaining physiological extracellular pH (pHe) is essential for oocyte viability and embryonic development, particularly during ICSI, when metaphase II oocytes have their intracellular pH (pHi) regulation mechanisms temporarily inactivated. HEPES- and MOPS-buffered handling media are routinely used in IVF laboratories, with decades of clinical use supporting their effectiveness and safety. Although concerns regarding their biological effects beyond pH buffering have occasionally emerged, most are derived from experimental settings and are not representative of clinical IVF procedures, more likely influenced by experimental conditions and media composition rather than by the zwitterions themselves. Nevertheless, while evidence from human oocytes remains extremely limited and preliminary, the improved embryological outcomes and transcriptomic profiles recently reported from bicarbonate-buffered handling media have renewed interest in exploring more physiological ICSI media formulations. While current evidence remains far from conclusive and insufficient to support immediate changes in clinical practice, emerging findings suggest that routine systems may not yet be fully optimized and could represent an opportunity for further improvement. Future evaluation of bicarbonate-buffered media for ICSI should include robust standardization of pH measurement methodologies together with optimization of handling conditions, including oil and dish characteristics, that influence pHe stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42579083What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.