ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Stage-structured, distributional prediction of IVF outcomes with conditional updating.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop a stage-structured, distribution-based prediction framework for in vitro fertilization (IVF) that generates full probability distributions at each treatment stage and enables conditional updating of downstream predictions when observed outcomes become known.
methodsWe conducted an observational modeling study using de-identified UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) registry data (2017-2018; up to 101,217 model-ready cycles after stage-specific filtering) to model egg retrieval, maturation, and fertilization. Egg retrieval was modeled using a zero-inflated negative binomial specification. Downstream transitions such as blastocyst formation, euploidy, vitrification survival, and live birth after euploid transfer were modeled using stage-specific logistic regressions calibrated to published cohorts and national registry summaries (429,507 additional observations). Predictive performance of HFEA-derived models was evaluated on held-out HFEA test sets using point-prediction accuracy, train-test gaps, prediction-interval coverage, and calibration across predicted outcome strata.
resultsThe framework propagates full probability distributions across sequential IVF stages rather than point estimates. Held-out HFEA validation showed minimal train-test degradation ( CONCLUSION(S): A sequential, distribution-based IVF prediction model with conditional updating provides uncertainty-quantified, stage-aware predictions that dynamically adapt to patient-specific outcomes, supporting more individualized counseling and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42579082What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.