ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
High Motivation but Low Access to PrEP: Social Determinants Undermine HIV Prevention Among Sexual and Gender Minority People Who Use Methamphetamine.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Methamphetamine (meth) use is endemic among sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations and a well-established correlate of HIV acquisition. Less understood are the behavioral, psychosocial, and structural vulnerabilities associated with meth use that may complicate HIV prevention. We examined differences in HIV-related vulnerabilities, perceptions of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) need, and access to PrEP care among SGM people who use meth compared with those who do not. Cross-sectional data were drawn from the baseline assessment (2022-2023) of a U.S. national cohort of SGM individuals aged 16-49 (n = 2,847 who used meth; n = 2,518 who did not). Participants completed an online survey assessing demographics, vulnerabilities associated with HIV acquisition and barriers to PrEP access, and PrEP use and interest. Multivariable logistic regression compared participants who recently used meth with those who did not. Compared with non-users, participants who used meth reported greater HIV-related vulnerability across multiple domains, including higher behavioral risk, greater socioeconomic disadvantage, lower engagement in HIV testing, and poorer psychosocial and mental health outcomes. They were also more likely to perceive themselves as appropriate candidates for PrEP and express interest in initiating PrEP, yet less likely to report access to resources and infrastructure that facilitate engagement in PrEP care. These findings may reflect a phenomenon we term the "Meth-PrEP Paradox," whereby individuals who use meth recognize their heightened vulnerability to HIV and express interest in PrEP while simultaneously encountering barriers to PrEP care. Longitudinal research is needed to evaluate this framework and identify strategies to improve HIV prevention among SGM people who use meth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.