ArticlePsychological research2026
Temporal effects of exercise on retrieval-induced forgetting.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) refers to the phenomenon whereby selectively retrieving some information impairs later recall of related, non-retrieved information, often interpreted as reflecting inhibitory control processes during memory retrieval. Recent work suggested that acute aerobic exercise performed between repeated memory tests may preserve the RIF effect over time. The present study sought to directly replicate and extend this finding using a larger and more controlled experimental design. Healthy young adults (N = 372) completed a standard category-exemplar RIF task involving selective retrieval practice followed by two final test assessments. Between the two tests, participants were randomly assigned to one of five conditions that manipulated exercise exposure, duration, and order (exercise, standing control, or combined sequences). Exercise was performed on a treadmill at vigorous intensity (80% heart-rate reserve), whereas control conditions involved standing on a stationary treadmill. Replicating the classic RIF effect, recall for Rp- items was significantly lower than for Nrp- items. However, contrary to prior findings, acute exercise did not preserve RIF across the two tests. Instead, the magnitude of RIF decreased from the first to the second test across all groups, driven primarily by improved recall of previously suppressed items. These findings indicate that RIF can attenuate with repeated retrieval but fail to provide evidence that acute exercise acts to stabilize retrieval-induced forgetting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.