ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Development of a deep learning model for detecting and measuring gallstones on computed tomography images.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop a deep learning model for the automated detection and measurement of gallstones on non-contrast CT images.
methodsA total of 3,231 CT scans were retrospectively enrolled as an internal cohort, while 753 CT scans from the public AMOS (Abdominal Multi-Organ Segmentation) dataset were employed as an independent external test set. Paired MR imaging served as the reference standard for the internal cohort (including development and hold-out datasets). A three-stage 3D V-Net convolutional neural network was developed for automated gallstone detection. The first stage performed coarse localization of the gallbladder, followed by refined 3D segmentation in the second stage to generate precise anatomical masks. In the final stage, gallstones were detected within the segmented gallbladder volume. Gallstone detection was categorized based on the spatial overlap (Dice similarity coefficient, DSC > 0) between reference labels and predictions.
resultsFor gallbladder segmentation, the DSCs were 0.992, 0.989, and 0.990 across training, validation, and internal test sets. Gallstone detection achieved mean DSCs of 0.794, 0.742, and 0.759 across the subgroups. For gallstone detection and segmentation, the model achieved overall sensitivities of 97.2%, 97.5%, 95.2%, 89.2%, and 98.2% across the training, validation, internal test, hold-out, and AMOS datasets, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed median DSCs of 0.835-0.897 for high-density stones and 0.792-0.854 for large stones.
conclusionThe developed model achieves high sensitivity and precise automated gallstone segmentation on CT images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42579008What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.