Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42578973›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2026

Association of high birth weight with risk of early-onset colorectal cancer.

Amrita Mukherjee, Lanfang Xu, Darios Getahun, Jessica Chubak, Jane C Figueiredo, Kimberly L Cannavale, Alec D Gilfillan, Bechien U Wu, Chun R Chao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amrita MukherjeeKaiser Permanente Southern California Pasadena, CA United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1713-2926
Lanfang XuMedHealth Statistical Consulting Inc. Solon, OH United States.ORCID 0009-0000-2659-9304
Darios GetahunKaiser Permanente Southern California Pasadena, CA United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3610-8841
Jessica ChubakKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute Seattle, WA United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1630-9021
Jane C FigueiredoCedars-Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles, CA United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8040-3341
Kimberly L CannavaleKaiser Permanente Southern California Pasadena, CA United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3892-9686
Alec D GilfillanKaiser Permanente Southern California Pasadena, CA United States.ORCID 0009-0002-6703-8102
Bechien U WuKaiser Permanente Los Angeles United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3304-2704
Chun R ChaoKaiser Permanente Southern California Pasadena, CA United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6072-4954

Funding

A Case-Control Study to Evaluate Broad-Spectrum Antibiotic use and High Birth Weight as Potential Risk Factors for Early-Onset Colorectal CancerR01CA258160 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CHAO, CHUN R. · 2021 to 2023
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA258160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly-onset colorectal cancer (eoCRC), particularly rectal cancer, is increasing. We evaluated the association between high birth weight and eoCRC in a nested case-control study.

methodsWe included patients aged 15-49 years diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma at Kaiser Permanente Southern California (2009-2021). Cancer-free controls were matched 10:1 on age, sex, and length of health plan membership. Record linkage with California Department of Public Health's birth registry was performed. Conditional logistic regression was used to evaluate associations between high birth weight, measured using (1) macrosomia (birth weight >4,000grams), and (2) large for gestational age (LGA; birth weight above the 90th percentile for gestational age and sex), and overall eoCRC, colon, and rectal cancer. Two-stage model adjustments were performed: first adjusting for pre-specified potential confounders, then adjusting for potential intermediates.

resultsOf 1,400 eligible cases and matched 13,608 controls, 471 eoCRC cases (mean diagnosis age: 41.1 years) and 1,931 controls with linked birth certificate were included. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) for eoCRC was 1.32 (95% CI: 0.95-1.84) for macrosomia and 1.38 (0.97-1.98) for LGA. Macrosomia and LGA were associated with a marginal, non-statistically significant elevated risk of rectal cancer [OR (95%CI): 1.69 (0.97-2.97) and 1.81 (0.96-3.41), respectively], but not colon cancer [OR (95%CI): 1.18 (0.78-1.80) and 1.20 (0.77-1.86) for macrosomia and LGA, respectively].

conclusionsAn elevated risk of early-onset rectal cancer was suggested in individuals with high birth weight. IMPACT: The impact of intrauterine conditions on eoCRC risk should be further evaluated.

Identifiers

PMID42578973
PMCPMC13557039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.