ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
Estimating the evolutionary fitness of specific synonymous codon changes.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Synonymous mutations do not alter proteins but undergo natural selection in many species. For Drosophila melanogaster, reports on selection strength vary from undetectable to surprisingly strong. Here we apply a new method to estimate the population selection coefficient (2Ns) for all 134 ordered pairs of synonymous codon changes. The method uses ratios of site frequency spectra for synonymous codon changes and matched neutral changes, avoiding reliance on divergence data or codon frequencies and remaining relatively insensitive to demographic history. Results indicate that natural selection on synonymous codons is weak, with |2Ns|<2.30 for all pairs of codons and |2Ns|<1 for 49% of codon changes. Despite being derived solely from polymorphism data, codon fitness estimates are strongly correlated with observed codon frequencies. A selection-mutation-drift model based on these estimates accurately predicts codon usage, while a model based on mutation alone fails. Codon fitness estimates also predict expression-associated codon usage, with higher-fitness codons used more often in highly expressed genes. However, the effect of expression on selection strength is modest, with a 10-fold increase in expression predicted to increase the average strength of selection on synonymous codons by only 14%. Finally, we detect clear signs that selection favors codon changes that stabilize mRNA secondary structure. The convergence of multiple independent lines of evidence validates this polymorphism-based approach and provides a coherent framework for understanding selection on synonymous site evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.