Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42578716›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

Fast-nnt: fast, reproducible, and scalable neighbour network analysis in R, Python, and CLI.

Rhys John Pembroke Newell, Eilish S McMaster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rhys John Pembroke NewellSchool of Life, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1300-6116
Eilish S McMasterSchool of Life, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7415-8690

Funding

University of Sydney Postgraduate AwardUniversity of Sydney School of Life and Evironmental Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationNeighbour networks are widely used to visualise evolutionary relationships in the presence of reticulation, admixture, or hybridization. Existing implementations are largely GUI-based, limiting reproducibility, integration into scripted workflows, and deployment on remote or high-performance computing systems. They are also computationally slow and memory-intensive at scale, restricting analyses to relatively small datasets. We present fast-nnt, an open-source Rust reimplementation of the neighbour-net algorithms from SplitsTree4 and SplitsTree6, providing interfaces for R, Python, and the command line.

resultsfast-nnt is substantially faster and more memory-efficient than existing tools, completing analyses of 3333 taxa in ∼148 seconds compared to ∼1640 seconds for SplitsTree6, an 11-fold improvement, while using less than half the memory. It accepts any symmetric distance matrix and reproduces SplitsTree output with near-identical accuracy. Both the circular ordering algorithms (Multi-Way, Closest-Pair) and split weight inference methods (Conjugate Gradient, Active-Set) are independently selectable, enabling modular and reproducible analyses. This removes a major computational barrier to routine use of neighbour-net methods in large-scale phylogenetics. By addressing key computational and usability bottlenecks in existing implementations, fast-nnt enables scalable, reproducible neighbour-network inference that is practical for large modern datasets. AVAILABILITY: Source code, documentation, and test data freely available at https://github.com/rhysnewell/fast-nnt. Implemented in Rust with R (fastnntr) and Python (fastnntpy) packages. An archived release is available at [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16907379]. Licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologySoftwarePhylogenyReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID42578716
PMCPMC13481693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.