ArticleEuropean journal of orthodontics2026
Automated prediction of hand-wrist maturation stage from lateral cephalometric and panoramic radiographs using a deep learning approach.
Article in European journal of orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to predict hand-wrist developmental stages, the most reliable indicator of skeletal maturation, from panoramic radiographs (PRs) and lateral cephalometric radiographs (LCRs) using deep learning and to compare the two methods. The goal was to provide a rapid and objective method for growth assessment in orthodontic planning without additional radiation exposure.
methodsA total of 3703 patients who underwent hand-wrist radiographs (HWRs), PRs, and LCRs prior to orthodontic treatment were retrospectively analyzed. HWRs were classified according to Björk's 9-stage system and reduced to 5- and 3-group schemes. YOLOv5 was used for automated reference point detection, and the extracted regions were classified using a multimodal deep learning framework. EfficientNet-B0 was used for 9-stage classification, and EfficientNet-B4 was used for 5- and 3-group classifications. Clinical variables (age, gender) were included, and hybrid loss strategies addressed class imbalance while preserving sequential stage relationships. Performance metrics included accuracy, recall, mAP@0.5, balanced accuracy, Cohen's Kappa coefficient, and detailed error analysis; 5-fold cross-validation and ensemble learning were used to improve robustness.
resultsYOLOv5 detected tooth roots in PRs (accuracy 92.5%, recall 93.3%, mAP@0.5 = 0.942) and cervical vertebrae in LCRs (accuracy 98.9%, recall 99.9%, mAP@0.5 = 0.995). In PRs, the standard accuracy in 9-, 5-, and 3-stage classifications was 0.3648, 0.5307, and 0.7520, respectively, while in LCRs, the standard accuracy in 9-, 5-, and 3-stage classifications was 0.4350, 0.6336, and 0.8975, respectively.
conclusionDeep learning can reliably automate skeletal maturation assessment across imaging methods and resolutions. Appropriately optimized models provide valuable decision support in orthodontic treatment, increasing efficiency and consistency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.