ReviewCurrent opinion in urology2026
De-escalation surgery for localized prostate cancer: rationale and future direction of precision prostatectomy.
Review in Current opinion in urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe evolution of radical prostatectomy has resulted in excellent oncologic outcomes; however, postoperative erectile dysfunction remains a clinical constraint. While oncologic control in focal therapy remains its main limitation, Menon Precision Prostatectomy, also referred to as Millimeter Precision Prostatectomy (MPP) was developed to bridge this therapeutic gap. The purpose of this review is to summarize the rationale, development, and future direction of MPP. RECENT
findingsAdvances in anatomical understanding have demonstrated that periprostatic innervation extends beyond the classical neurovascular bundles, with a complex network of autonomic fibers distributed along the prostatic capsule, Denonvilliers' fascia, and the seminal vesicle complex. MPP was designed to enhance the preservation of these nerve-rich structures. In its initial iteration, a unilateral thin rim of prostatic tissue and the ipsilateral seminal vesicle were preserved, whereas dissection on the tumor-bearing side followed the principles of standard radical prostatectomy. SUMMARY: Prospective studies demonstrated favorable oncologic outcomes with superior functional recovery compared to contemporary radical prostatectomy. However, the technically demanding subcapsular dissection raised concerns regarding generalizability. MPP Version 2 was developed as a modification of this concept. In this technique, the prostate is removed en bloc, while both seminal vesicles are preserved, thereby maintaining the integrity of their surrounding neural structures. This approach extends beyond prior seminal vesicle-sparing techniques, which were limited to partial preservation. MPP V2 is currently under clinical investigation, aiming to improve functional outcomes for patients undergoing prostatectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.