Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42578298›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in urology2026

RADA16 as a novel hemostatic and regenerative agent in urology: European Association of Urology endourology up-to-date overview.

Ali Talyshinskii, Bhaskar Kumar Somani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ali TalyshinskiiGenome clinic, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Bhaskar Kumar SomaniUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSelf-assembling peptide (SAP) hydrogels represent a novel class of synthetic biomaterials with growing relevance in surgery. Among them, the ion-complementary peptide RADA16 has gained attention as an athermal, transparent, and biocompatible hemostatic agent. While its use is increasingly reported in multiple surgical specialties, evidence specific to urology remains fragmented. This review aims to summarize the physicochemical properties, mechanisms of action, and current clinical evidence for RADA16-based hydrogels, with a particular focus on urological applications. RECENT

findingsRADA16 rapidly self-assembles into a transparent, extracellular-matrix-like nanofibrillar hydrogel upon exposure to physiological fluids, providing effective local hemostasis without reliance on the coagulation cascade. Preclinical and clinical data from other surgical fields demonstrate rapid bleeding control, favorable safety, and potential regenerative effects. Emerging urological evidence suggests that RADA16 is effective in managing hemorrhagic cystitis, radiation-induced hematuria, and bleeding during prostate surgery, including robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and benign prostate surgery. Beyond hemostasis, RADA16 may support wound healing and promotion of re-epithelialization. However, the current evidence base is limited by small sample sizes, lack of comparative studies, heterogeneous methodologies, and short follow-up. SUMMARY: RADA16-based hydrogels represent a promising adjunctive hemostatic option in urology, offering technical advantages such as transparency, absence of thermal injury, minimal swelling, and applicability in confined or high-risk settings. Robust prospective, comparative, and cost-effectiveness studies are required to define its definitive role in routine urological practice.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalHemostaticsAnimalsCystitis, HemorrhagicHumansHydrogelsMalePeptidesProstatectomyUrologyHemostaticsHydrogelsPeptidesRADA16-IbleedinghemostatichydrogelRADA16

Identifiers

PMID42578298
PMCPMC13566473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.