Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42578258›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine research2026

Pulse Index Continuous Cardiac Output-Guided Hemodynamic Therapy in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Van Dung Le, Huu Tu Nguyen, Quang Thuy Luu, Minh Hoang Thach, Thi Thuy Trang Tran, Van Dong Pham, Francis Zamora, Gary Ta-Wei Yu, Viet Hoang Dinh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Van Dung LeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Huu Tu NguyenHanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Quang Thuy LuuCenter of Anesthesia & Surgical Intensive Care, Viet Duc Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Minh Hoang ThachDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Thi Thuy Trang TranDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Van Dong PhamDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Francis ZamoraCenter for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Gary Ta-Wei YuCenter for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Viet Hoang DinhCenter for Health Disparities and Molecular Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Central venous pressure (CVP)-guided fluid therapy remains common during kidney transplantation, although CVP is a static marker with limited ability to predict fluid responsiveness. This prospective observational cohort study evaluated whether pulse index continuous cardiac output-guided goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT), using dynamic and volumetric hemodynamic variables, was associated with improved early graft function compared with conventional CVP-guided management in living donor kidney transplantation. Methods: Eighty living donor kidney transplant recipients at Cho Ray Hospital, Vietnam, were enrolled between May 2024 and December 2025. Patients were managed according to the institutional anesthetic monitoring protocol in use at the time of surgery: CVP-guided fluid therapy (group C, n = 40) or PiCCO-guided GDHT (group P, n = 40). The PiCCO protocol incorporated stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, cardiac index, global end-diastolic volume index, systemic vascular resistance index, and extravascular lung water index. Outcomes included intraoperative fluid volume, vasopressor use, postoperative urine output, serum creatinine through postoperative day 7, delayed graft function, and postoperative complications. Results: Baseline recipient, donor, and operative characteristics were comparable between groups, with the exception of cold ischemia time, which was longer in group P. Total intraoperative fluid volume was lower in group P than in group C (2,656 ± 480 mL vs. 3,097 ± 555 mL; P = 0.001), and vasopressor use was numerically lower but not statistically significant (12.5% vs. 27.5%; Fisher's exact P = 0.161). First-hour postoperative urine output was higher in group P (1,235 ± 162 mL vs. 1,010 ± 315 mL; P < 0.001). Serum creatinine was similar on postoperative day 1 but was significantly lower in group P on day 3 (1.3 (0.8-1.8) mg/dL vs. 1.6 (1.4-1.9) mg/dL; P = 0.036); the difference on day 7 was not statistically significant (1.1 (0.7-1.4) mg/dL vs. 1.3 (1.1-2.1) mg/dL; P = 0.16). No patient in either group developed delayed graft function within 7 days. Extravascular lung water index remained within the reference range during surgery, and no patient developed clinical pulmonary edema. Conclusions: In this prospective cohort, PiCCO-guided GDHT was associated with lower intraoperative fluid administration, numerically lower vasopressor use, and faster early recovery of graft function after living donor kidney transplantation. These findings support further evaluation of multiparameter hemodynamic monitoring as an individualized perioperative strategy in kidney transplantation.

Indexed as

Delayed graft functionGoal-directed hemodynamic therapyKidney transplantationPerioperative fluid managementPiCCOStroke volume variationTranspulmonary thermodilution

Identifiers

PMID42578258
PMCPMC13456939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.