ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
An innovative technique for facial deformity reconstruction following mucormycosis using three-dimensional printing: a case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Extensive destruction of the facial bones caused by mucormycosis poses a significant challenge for surgeons during the reconstruction phase. In this context, three-dimensional (3D) printing plays a pivotal role in the accurate planning and design of patient-specific implants tailored to the patient's deficient bone anatomy. Presentation of case: A 52-year-old male patient presented with extensive destruction of the maxilla, zygomatic bones, and the floor of the nasal cavity secondary to mucormycosis. The patient was unable to phonate or swallow due to oronasal communication resulting from complete continuity between the oral and nasal cavities. Discussion: Conventional reconstructive approaches typically require large volumes of autologous bone grafts, prolonged operative time, and multiple surgical stages. Accordingly, reconstruction using 3D printing technology with patient-specific titanium implants was employed. Conclusion: Reconstruction with a 3D-printed, patient-specific titanium implant yielded a satisfactory outcome within a single surgical procedure and a relatively short operative time. Furthermore, precise 3D planning facilitated subsequent dental rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.