ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Malignant esophageal perforation with pleural empyema: a successful robotic esophagectomy with primary reconstruction - a case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Esophageal perforation, particularly when associated with malignancy, is a rare and life-threatening condition with a high mortality rate. Evidence regarding optimal management remains limited, with treatment options ranging from conservative measures to surgery, including staged repair or primary anastomosis. Further data are needed to guide the best practices for these complex cases. Case presentation: A 69-year-old man developed a malignant esophageal perforation following stent placement during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The course was complicated by sepsis, pleural empyema, and mediastinitis. A single-stage robotic-assisted esophagectomy with primary reconstruction and simultaneous decortication, and lavage of the empyema was performed. The anastomosis was protected using EsoSPONGE Clinical discussion: The optimal treatment strategy for malignant esophageal perforations remains unclear. In this case, resection with a direct anastomosis was feasible and prevented the patient from requiring further surgery. A high-volume center with specialized expertise and an interdisciplinary approach, involving intensive care, endoscopy, oncology, nutritional medicine, and surgery, was essential in achieving the best possible outcome. Conclusion: Primary anastomosis following resection in malignant esophageal perforations, complicated by sepsis and pleural empyema, is a feasible treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.