ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans mimicking hemorrhoids: a rare case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is a rare soft tissue sarcoma. Perianal involvement is exceptional and may mimic benign anorectal disease, leading to delayed diagnosis. Case presentation: A 28-year-old man presented with 6 months of anal pain, pruritus, and intermittent bleeding, initially treated as hemorrhoids. Surgical excision of presumed hemorrhoidal tissue revealed dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with fibrosarcomatous transformation and focally involved margins. Molecular testing confirmed COL1A1-PDGFB fusion. Staging PET-CT showed localized disease without distant metastasis. After multidisciplinary discussion, the patient underwent radical re-excision, including part of the internal anal sphincter. No residual malignancy was identified, and final margins were clear. Follow-up clinical assessment and imaging showed no evidence of recurrence. Clinical discussion: Perianal dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is rare and can resemble common anorectal conditions. Fibrosarcomatous transformation increases the risk of recurrence and requires complete excision with negative margins. Histopathology and molecular testing are essential for diagnosis. Long-term surveillance is required because recurrence may occur years after treatment. Conclusion: Persistent or atypical anorectal symptoms should prompt a biopsy. Complete excision with negative margins remains the key treatment principle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.